TASK 3
Zimmerman and West
The data supports their theory. This is because they state that in mixed-sex conversations men are more likely to interrupt women and the data shows on average that men did interrupt in the meeting more than the women
Geoffrey Beattie
The data would not support their theory as they state that interruptions don't necessarily reflect dominance and that interruptions may have occurred because the person has interest and wants to be involved.
O'Barr & Atkins
The data would mot support their theory as they believe women can interrupt as well because of a study they did in a courtroom that showed that women were more assertive and interrupt but witnesses, no matter what gender, would use Robin Lakoff's "weak language". This suggested that it is "powerless language" not "weak language".
Pamela Fishman
This supports her theory as she believes that men have a dominant personality and the data shows that men interrupted more on average which suggests that they are more dominant and assertive that women.
Robin Lakoff
This may support her theory as one approach is that women speak in italics so they can distance themselves from utterances. The data suggests that this could be a reason as to why the men spoke more during the meeting than the women as they didn't want to speak nonsense.
Dale Spender
The data supports her theory as she states that men have had more power over women across the years so are able to get their opinion heard. The data shows this as more men interrupted per term
The data supports their theory. This is because they state that in mixed-sex conversations men are more likely to interrupt women and the data shows on average that men did interrupt in the meeting more than the women
Geoffrey Beattie
The data would not support their theory as they state that interruptions don't necessarily reflect dominance and that interruptions may have occurred because the person has interest and wants to be involved.
O'Barr & Atkins
The data would mot support their theory as they believe women can interrupt as well because of a study they did in a courtroom that showed that women were more assertive and interrupt but witnesses, no matter what gender, would use Robin Lakoff's "weak language". This suggested that it is "powerless language" not "weak language".
Pamela Fishman
This supports her theory as she believes that men have a dominant personality and the data shows that men interrupted more on average which suggests that they are more dominant and assertive that women.
Robin Lakoff
This may support her theory as one approach is that women speak in italics so they can distance themselves from utterances. The data suggests that this could be a reason as to why the men spoke more during the meeting than the women as they didn't want to speak nonsense.
Dale Spender
The data supports her theory as she states that men have had more power over women across the years so are able to get their opinion heard. The data shows this as more men interrupted per term
Comments
Post a Comment